Logo

 

Wicked Repots Case Study:

Tier 11 + Pet Ecommerce Brand

Vector 212

 

How Tier 11 cut nCAC 34% and grew new customers 25% — on 2.7% more spend — by fixing what the scoreboard was actually measuring.

 

Interactive Demo
Book A Live Demo
Hero-1

At a glance

Vector 12-4

 

+21.9%

Revenue Growth

34%

nCAC Reduction ($193 → $128)

+25.0%

New Customers

10,870

New Customers Acquired

-91%

Amazon Ad Spend Cut (Sales Held)

+2.7%

Total Spend Increase

The Brand & The Agency

Vector 144

 
Brand icon

Brand

Pet Ecommerce Brand

A direct-to-consumer pet brand with a premium, technology-driven product. Sold through their DTC site, Amazon, and select retail partners. A premium price point means every new customer acquisition dollar has to count.

Tier 11 logo

Agency

Tier 11

A performance marketing agency specializing in full-funnel growth for DTC brands. Their methodology — the Conversion Engine — integrates creative, traffic, landing page, and data & analytics into a single operating rhythm.

Tier 11 runs campaigns across Meta, YouTube, Google, Bing, TikTok, Amazon, and native advertising platforms.

The Challenge:
Five Months of Missed Forecasts

Vector 12-2

 

From June through October 2025, the brand missed unit targets every single month while spend climbed. The platform dashboards showed activity. The business wasn't growing. Something was wrong at the measurement layer — they just didn't know what.

 

 
5 Missed Forecasts in a Row icon

5 Missed Forecasts in a Row

From June through October 2025, unit targets were missed every single month while ad spend kept climbing.

nCAC at All-Time High icon

nCAC at All-Time High ($193)

Budget was concentrated in bottom-of-funnel channels capturing demand instead of creating it.

Attribution Hiding the Real Picture icon

Attribution Hiding the Real Picture

Amazon and Google Brand looked productive. Both were taking credit for conversions driven by top-of-funnel activity they had nothing to do with.

The Retargeting Trap icon

The Retargeting Trap

Bottom-of-funnel channels were quietly consuming budget that should have been creating new customers. The scoreboard looked fine. The business was stalling.

 
Book A Live Demo

The Root Cause:
Wrong Scoreboard, Wrong Channels

Vector 13-2

The team was optimizing toward the wrong signals. Bottom-of-funnel channels — Amazon Brand, Google Brand — were consuming budget and claiming credit for conversions they didn't create. Top-of-funnel campaigns were being starved.

This is the retargeting trap. You're not scaling. You're paying to re-acquire customers you already have — and the scoreboard says everything is fine.
 

The fix wasn't a new creative strategy. It was getting the measurement right first.

The Root Cause

The Strategic Shift:
Measure Correctly, Then Decide

Vector 144

 

Tier 11 implemented a three-part shift through their Conversion Engine methodology — but every decision was anchored to a single question: what does Wicked Reports show about new customer creation?

 

Step 1

Incrementality Testing to Surface Attribution Lies

Before moving a single dollar, the team ran controlled experiments to prove which channels were actually driving new customers vs. taking credit for conversions created elsewhere.

Amazon spend was cut 50%. Then 50% again. Then 50% again. Four consecutive cuts. Total reduction: 91% — from $52,500/month to $4,700/month. New customer units held steady at approximately 500/month. Revenue from Amazon increased 33%.

Google Brand was cut 95% over four months ($44,600 to $2,300). Clicks dropped only 17%. The brand had been paying a premium to appear for searches that would have found them organically anyway.

The data was clear: Wicked confirmed it. Both channels were Attribution Lies — channels that look productive because they harvest demand created elsewhere.

Step 1 chart

Step 2

Reallocate to Demand Creation

Budget freed from Amazon and Google Brand flowed to channels with a proven job: creating new customers who have never heard of the brand.

  • Top-of-funnel share grew from 39.9% to 50.6% of total spend
  • Meta and YouTube received additional investment
  • Taboola native ads launched November 1 — driving 80–87% new visit rates across all advertorial campaigns

Native ads consistently delivered the highest new-visitor percentage of any channel — a direct measure of true top-of-funnel reach.

Step 2 chart

Step 3

Track nCAC and nMER, Not Platform ROAS

The team replaced in-platform ROAS as the primary KPI. Platform reporting will always undercount top-of-funnel. It's structurally incapable of crediting channels that create customers weeks before those customers convert.

Instead: nCAC and New Customer Media Efficiency Ratio (nMER) became the north star metrics. These are first-party numbers from Wicked Reports — not modeled, not view-through-inflated, not subject to platform incentives.

If the nCAC is dropping and new customers are growing, the system is working. That's the scoreboard.

Step 3 chart

Results:
34% nCAC Drop on Nearly Flat Spend

Vector 12-2

 

From the November 1 turning point through February 2026 — four consecutive months, including the historically slowest months of the year for this brand. The historically slow December and January months saw nCAC hit an all-time low of $128 — down from a peak of $193. That's not a seasonal tailwind. That's a measurement correction producing real budget efficiency.

 

 

The Halo Effect: Channels That Grew Without Additional Spend

 

Performance results icon

When top-of-funnel demand creation actually works, the whole funnel lifts. That’s exactly what happened:

  • Organic revenue: +24% (zero additional ad spend)
  • Email revenue: +13% (zero additional ad spend)
  • Amazon revenue: +33% (on 66% less ad spend)
Restructured channel mix icon

Google and Bing were restructured from approximately 20% non-brand to approximately 80% non-brand. January and February exceeded forecast by 20–30%.

Why It Worked:
The Correct Measurement Layer

Vector 144

 

Most attribution failures aren't creative failures. They're measurement failures. When you're graded on the wrong scoreboard with the wrong metrics in the wrong attribution windows, you make systematically wrong decisions — even when your instincts are right.

 

Tier 11 didn't just test new channels. They rebuilt the measurement layer first:

 
New Customer vs. Repeat Customer Clarity icon

New Customer vs. Repeat Customer Clarity

Platform ROAS doesn't distinguish who bought. Wicked does. The team needed to see — at the campaign and channel level — exactly how many new customers each dollar was creating.

First-Party Attribution, Not Platform Claims icon

First-Party Attribution, Not Platform Claims

Real order IDs, real customer IDs, real click paths. Not modeled conversions. Not view-through credits. The team needed data they could defend.

The Correct KPI for Each Campaign's Intention icon

The Correct KPI for Each Campaign's Intention

Top-of-funnel campaigns should not be judged by last-click ROAS. Wicked's 5 Forces framework assigns the right window, the right metric, and the right Scale/Chill/Kill zone before any budget decision is made.

nMER as North Star icon

nMER as North Star

The team moved off vanity metrics and onto New Customer Media Efficiency Ratio — a metric that blended CPU and new customer revenue into a single defensible KPI for exec-level reporting.

 
Book A Live Demo

A Note on Native Advertising

Vector 144

 

Native advertising via Taboola was launched on November 1 as part of the demand creation push. The channel was measured correctly from day one — not by in-platform ROAS, but by new visitor creation efficiency (eCPNV: effective cost per new visitor).

 

~$150K

Taboola Spend (3 months)

80–87%

New Visit Rate

$0.15–$1.01

eCPNV Range

Wicked Reports confirmed which native campaigns were creating new customers vs. which were surfacing to existing ones. That signal changed the optimization decisions.

What This Means for Your Brand

Vector 12-2

 

If this story sounds familiar, it's not a coincidence. The retargeting trap is one of the most common — and most expensive — misallocations in performance marketing today.

 

 

You Might Be In This Trap If...

Advertising for 12+ months with stable or growing spend

Blended ROAS looks acceptable on paper

Multi-touch human interactions

New customer growth has stalled or is declining

Monthly targets are consistently missed despite spending more

You're not sure which channels are actually creating demand

What the Data Is Likely Telling You

Your bottom-of-funnel channels are taking credit they didn’t earn

Your top-of-funnel is chronically underfunded

You're measuring the wrong thing — and making budget decisions accordingly

A measurement correction could unlock meaningful growth with nearly the same spend

The fix isn't a new creative angle or a new ad platform. The fix is a measurement system that separates new customers from repeat customers at the campaign level — so you can see exactly which channels are building your business and which ones are borrowing from it.

 
Book A Live Demo

Want to Know What Your Attribution Is Actually Telling You?

Vector 144

 

Wicked Reports gives you:

 

First-party attribution icon

First-party, click-based attribution — real order IDs, real customer IDs, not modeled estimates.

Customer segmentation icon

New vs. repeat customer segmentation at the campaign, ad set, and creative level.

Decision framework icon

Scale / Chill / Kill decision framework powered by the correct KPI for each campaign's intention.

Advanced signal icon

Advanced Signal to send new-customer-specific conversion events back to Meta and Google — correcting platform optimization bias at the source.

Book a live demo and see exactly where your current attribution is costing you money

Book A Live Demo
{